Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 — Date of next increment in the revised pay structure under Rule 10 of the CCS(RP) Rules, 2008.

MOST IMMEDIATE

No.10/02/2011-E.III/A

Government of India

Ministry of Finance

Department of Expenditure

New Delhi, the 19th March, 2012

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject:— Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 — Date of next increment in the revised pay structure under Rule 10 of the CCS(RP) Rules, 2008.

In accordance with the provisions contained in Rule 10 of the CCS (RP) Rules, 2008, there will be a uniform date of annual increment, viz. 1st July of every year.  Employees completing 6 months and above in the revised pay structure as on 1st of July will be eligible to be granted the increment. The first increment after fixation of pay on 1.1.2006 in the revised pay structure will be granted on 1.7.2006 for those employees for whom the date of next increment was between 1st July, 2006 to 1st January, 2007.

RIGHT TO LEAVE - CCS (LEAVE) RULES - RULE -7

Right to leave

 (1) Leave cannot be claimed as of right

 
(2) When the exigencies of public service so require, leave of any kind may be refused or revoked by the authority competent to grant it, but it shall not be open to that authority to alter the kind of leave due and applied for except at the written request of the Government servant

Disciplinary Authorities - Penalties specified in Rule 11

Courtesy : http://90paisa.blogspot.com/

(1) The President may impose any of the penalties specified in Rule 11 on any Government servant. 

EXPLANATION - II. Where a Government servant belonging to a Service or holding a Central Civil post of any Group, is promoted, whether on probation or temporarily to the Service or Central Civil post of the next higher Group, he shall be deemed for the purposes of this rule to belong to the Service of, or hold the Central Civil post of, such higher Group. 

16. EXPLANATION - I . For the purposes of clause (c), 'probationer' means a person appointed to a Central Civil Service on probation. 

(c) in respect of a probationer undergoing training at the Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Adminstration the Director of the said Academy shall be the authority competent to impose on such probationer any of the penalties specified in clauses (i) and (iii) of rule 11 after observing the procedure laid down in rule. 

(b) where a Government servant who is a member of a Service other than the General Central Service or who has been substantively appointed to any civil post in the General Central Service, is temporarily appointed to any other Service ro post, the authority competent to impose on such Government servant any of the penalties specified in clauses (v) to (ix) of Rule 11 shall not impose any such penalties unless it has consulted such authority, not being an authority subordinate to it, as would have been competent under sub-rule (2) to impose on the Government servant any of the said penalties had he not been appointed to such other Service or post ; 

(a) except where the penalty specified in clause (v) or clause (vi) of Rule 11 is imposed by the Comptroller and Auditor-General on a member of the Indian Audit and Accounts Service, no penalty specified in clause (v) to (ix) of that rule shall be imposed by any authority subordinate to the appointing authority; 

(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in this rule- 

(b) if he is serving in any office, by the head of that office, except where the head of that office is lower in rank than the authority competent to impose the penalty under sub-rule (2). 

(a) if a serving in a Ministry or Department of the Government of India, by the Secretary to the Government of India in that Ministry or Department, or 

(3) Subject to the provisions of sub-rule (4), the power to impose any of the penalties specified in Rule 11 may also be exercised, in the case of a member of a Central Civil Services, Group ' C' (other than the Central Secretariat Clerical Service), or a Central Civil Service, Group 'D', - 

(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-rule (1), but subject to the provisions of sub-rule (4), any of the penalties specified in Rule 11 may be imposed on - (a) a member of a Central Civil Service other than the General Central Service, by the appointing authority or the authority specified in the schedule in this behalf or by any other authority empowered in this behalf by a general or special order of the President ; (b) a person appointed to a Central Civil Post included in the General Central Service, by the authority specified in this behalf by a general or special order of the President or, where no such order has been made, by the appointing authority or the authority specified in the Schedule in this behalf. 

Departmental proceedings against Govt Employees - consultation with the UPSC for advice

N0.39035/0112011-Estt.(B)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions
(Department of Personnel 8 Training)
~~~

New Delhi, 10th May, 2011

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject:- Departmental proceedings against Government servants - consultation with the Union Public Service Commission for advice.

The undersigned is directed to say that this Department has been impressing upon various Ministries / Departments to complete the disciplinary proceedings by minimizing avoidable delays. In para 3.11.10 of the 4th report of the 2nd ARC titled "Ethics in governance", it has been observed from a sample study that the Administrative Departments take more than 2/3rd of the time taken to process the case under the CCS(CCA) Rules. In the sample study, the Inquiry Officers were found to be taking about 17% of the time and the UPSC about 5% of the time to conclude their findings. This Department has issued OM No.3901111212009-Estt.(B) dated 14.9.2010 reiterating that the requisite details in the proforma to be sent to the UPSC are properly filled up and sent with the relevant documents so that there does not arise occasion for the UPSC to make a back reference to the Ministries / Departments for the deficiencies found by the Commission in the papers sent to them.

2. The UPSC has brought to the notice of this Department that during the year 2010-11 the Commission had to return the case to the concerned Departments in more than 40% of the cases on account of procedural / documentary deficiencies. A list of the common deficiencies observed by the Commission in these cases are / given. in the Annexure.  All Ministries / Departments are requested to ensure that the deficiencies indicated in the Annexure are not repeated in the proposals being sent to the UPSC for seeking its advice on disciplinary matters.

3. Attention of Ministries / Departments is also drawn to this Department's OM  No.3901111212009-Estt.(B) dated 16.11.2010 wherein it has been requested that in cases where the Courts are being apprised of the time taken in finalizing a disciplinary proceeding through affidavit, information in regard to the pendency of  the matter before the UPSC may be correctly projected. The average time taken by the Commission in tendering advice in disciplinary proceedings is about 4 to 6 months. The Commission tender its advice in about 3 months in those cases where priority is attached due to direction of Court. In such cases, in order to sypedite scrutiny of the cases a single window system on pilot basis had been introduced in the UPSC from September 2010 and initially 9 Ministries / Departments were included in the single window system. The Commission has now decided to extend the single window system to all other Ministries / Departments whose offices are situated in Delhi for submission of disciplinary cases involving court cases. Under this system, a Ministry / Department while referring the disciplinary cases to the Commission for advice, is required to authorize a representative, not below the level  of Under Secretary, to hand over the case to the designated officer in the UPSC, with prior appointment. The cases received from a Ministry / Department are initially scrutinized on the spot, in terms of information sought in the Proforma check list issued by this Department. Only cases which are complete as per the check list are
accepted by the Commission for further scrutiny and examination. Incomplete cases are returned at the counter itself after pointing out the deficiencies. In UPSC, the  case records are to be handed over to the Under Secretary (S-1),(Tel No.23387346123098591-Ext.4342) in Room No.10-A located in the Annexure Building of the Commission. The case records should explicitly indicate the status of the CATICourt cases, the fact regarding the time limit for disposal of the case if any and extension sought for providing at least 3-4 months of time to the Commission for
disposal of the case.

4. All Ministries / Departments are requested to adhere to the above procedure for submission of disciplinary cases involving Court cases to the Commission through single window system.

(C.A. Subramanian)

Director

Download DoPT Circular Below

Download